• About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Tuesday, July 1, 2025
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The NY Journals
  • Home
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Trending
  • Home
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Trending
No Result
View All Result
The NY Journals
No Result
View All Result
Home Health

Request to block ArriveCan probe into alleged misconduct dismissed

by Sarkiya Ranen
in Health
Request to block ArriveCan probe into alleged misconduct dismissed
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Breadcrumb Trail Links

  1. News
  2. Canadian Politics
  3. Canada

The reports have not been made public, but Zinn confirmed that they were highly critical of both men

Published May 29, 2024  •  Last updated 4 minutes ago  •  4 minute read

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

The ArriveCan app on a smartphone. Photo by DAX MELMER/WINDSOR STAR FILES

Article content

OTTAWA — A judge rejected a request by two federal officials to block an internal investigation into allegations they committed “serious misconduct” relating to government contracting and the ArriveCan app.

In a ruling dated Tuesday, Federal Court Justice Russel W. Zinn said applicants Antonio Utano and Cameron Macdonald, public service executives who worked at Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) while ArriveCan was under development, turned to the court prematurely when they asked it to halt a government probe into allegations of “serious misconduct” raised by a Montreal-based company, Botler AI.

Advertisement 2

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

National Post

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay, Rex Murphy and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay, Rex Murphy and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Don’t have an account? Create Account

or

Article content

The ruling says Botler offered to share its findings about Utano and Macdonald to CBSA “in exchange for a contract.” Zinn wrote that the company provided the agency with the allegations the following month but does not specify if the government provided Botler with a contract in exchange.

At issue for Utano and Macdonald was a draft investigative report, called a “preliminary statement of facts” (PSF), written and then circulated within government by CBSA officials on the two men regarding allegations of contract wrongdoing while they worked at the border agency.

The reports have not been made public, but Zinn confirmed that they were highly critical of both men. In January, CBSA President Ein O’Gorman said it found “there was a pattern of persistent collaboration between certain officials and GCStrategies”, the firm at the centre of the ArriveCan scandal.

Recommended from Editorial

Utano and Macdonald described the allegations in their lawsuit as “spurious, scandalous” and replete with “unsubstantiated and untested” accusations.

First Reading

First Reading

Your guide to the world of Canadian politics. (Subscriber exclusive on Saturdays)

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Thanks for signing up!

A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of First Reading will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Article content

Advertisement 3

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Zinn wrote that once the PSFs were provided to Utano and Macdonald’s current employers, respectively the Canada Revenue Agency and Health Canada, both were suspended without pay and had their security clearances revoked.

“The PSFs have undoubtedly had a detrimental effect on the Applicants, as their dissemination to the Applicants’ employers directly led to them losing their security clearance and being suspended without pay. Having read the PSFs, I understand the Applicants’ concerns regarding their careers, reputations, dignity, and livelihoods as a result of their dissemination,” Zinn wrote.

Utano and Macdonald’s lawyer Christopher Spiteri told National Post they have since both had their pay reinstated but remain on medical leave.

So, in February, Utano and Macdonald asked the Federal Court to block CBSA’s investigation, declare that they were treated unfairly because they have yet to see the allegations advanced by Botler AI, and block any further spread of the PSFs. They also asked the court to order CBSA to delegate the investigation to a third-party investigator.

Advertisement 4

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

But Zinn ruled that the men turned to the court prematurely, ruling that they first should have filed a grievance against the PSF.

Furthermore, the judge noted that the reports are only preliminary and that CBSA’s investigation into Utano and Macdonald is ongoing and that no final decision on the allegations have been taken.

“There are no extraordinary circumstances before me that would warrant intervention at this stage of the proceedings,” Zinn wrote.

The judge also found there was no reason to block the government from further sharing the PSFs because Utano and Macdonald had likely already suffered the brunt of the consequences of its dissemination to both their bosses and the House of Commons government operations committee (OGGO).

“It is unclear what relief the injunction would offer the Applicants given that the PSFs have already been distributed to their employers and the OGGO. Any alleged harm flowing from the PSFs appears to have already significantly materialized,” Zinn wrote.

In an interview, Utano and Macdonald’s lawyer Christopher Spiteri said the ruling was ultimately a win for the two men because it confirmed their ability to grieve a draft investigation report.

Advertisement 5

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

He also said he was happy to see the court confirm that the investigation into his clients was directly linked to the Botler AI allegations, which he says CBSA has yet to release to his clients.

The Botler allegations are not linked to ArriveCan specifically but raise concerns that Macdonald directed the company to work with GC Strategies, an IT consulting firm at the heart of the ArriveCan scandal.

Utano and Macdonald have faced allegations of being overly cozy with certain private contractors, including GC Strategies. For example, they confirmed having participated in a virtual whisky tasting offered by a government contractor, but insisted all their contacts were disclosed to superiors.

Earlier this year, Auditor General Karen Hogan published a scathing report that found the cost of the application ballooned from $80,000 to potentially over $60 million. Part of the issue was a “glaring disregard” for “basic” procurement principles.

GC Strategies received nearly $20 million of that amount, which auditor general Karen Hogan said she could not confirm because the government’s bookkeeping for the project was the worst she’d ever seen.

cnardi@postmedia.com
National Post

Get even more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.

Article content

Share this article in your social network



Source link

Tags: AllegedArriveCanBlockDismissedMisconductProbeRequest
Sarkiya Ranen

Sarkiya Ranen

I am an editor for Ny Journals, focusing on business and entrepreneurship. I love uncovering emerging trends and crafting stories that inspire and inform readers about innovative ventures and industry insights.

Next Post
“Will She Take Sanyas?” Ajit Pawar On Activist’s “Pressure” Claims in Porsche Case

"Will She Take Sanyas?" Ajit Pawar On Activist's "Pressure" Claims in Porsche Case

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Musk offers factory tours to investors as he seeks support for his US billion pay package

Musk offers factory tours to investors as he seeks support for his US$56 billion pay package

1 year ago
Novo Nordisk overtakes SAP as Europe’s most valuable company

Novo Nordisk overtakes SAP as Europe’s most valuable company

3 weeks ago

Popular News

    Connect with us

    The NY Journals pride themselves on assembling a proficient and dedicated team comprising seasoned journalists and editors. This collective commitment drives us to provide our esteemed readership with nothing short of the most comprehensive, accurate, and captivating news coverage available.

    Transcending the bounds of New York City to encompass a broader scope, we ensure that our audience remains well-informed and engaged with the latest developments, both locally and beyond.

    NEWS

    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Real Estate
    Instagram Youtube

    © 2025 The New York Journals. All Rights Reserved.

    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Trending

    Copyright © 2023 The Nyjournals

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In