• About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Thursday, February 5, 2026
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The NY Journals
  • Home
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Trending
  • Home
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Trending
No Result
View All Result
The NY Journals
No Result
View All Result
Home Health

Stakeholders upset over forcing streamers to pay into broadcasting fund

by Sarkiya Ranen
in Health
Stakeholders upset over forcing streamers to pay into broadcasting fund
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Breadcrumb Trail Links

  1. News
  2. Canada
  3. Canadian Politics

Music Canada’s CEO calls the decision ‘a complete miss of an opportunity’ that does little but prop up outdated aspects of Canada’s broadcasting industry

Published Jul 25, 2024  •  Last updated 2 hours ago  •  4 minute read

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

CRTC CEO Vicky Eatrides in 2023. The regulator says its new tax on streaming companies “brings more fairness and more funds into the Canadian broadcasting system.” Photo by Spencer Colby/The Canadian Press/File

Article content

Last month’s decision by Canada’s broadcast regulator mandating that streaming providers like Spotify and Apple Music pay taxes into a legacy broadcasting fund is based on pre-internet thinking that rewards old firms while discouraging investment in new innovation, the country’s recording industry association says.

Music Canada CEO Patrick Rogers said he had hoped new rules were going to focus less on industry policy and more on Canadian artists, but he said last month’s decision does little but prop up outdated aspects of Canada’s broadcasting industry — particularly that nearly half of the taxes collected will support terrestrial radio broadcasters.

Advertisement 2

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

National Post

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Don’t have an account? Create Account

or

Article content

“We spent three-and-a-half years working towards a modern regulatory system … and a goal was to create a regulatory regime around it. We really bought into it, and we were happy to take part in it,” he said.

“Throughout, I would say things like ‘the one thing we can’t do is jam the old rules onto this brand new economy,’ and everyone would go ‘oh no, we’re never do that.’”

Rogers said despite his and others’ efforts, that’s exactly what happened — describing last month’s “bewildering” tax decision as a means to hold onto old policy rather than to modernize, ignoring the role licensed streaming plays in building the careers of Canadian artists.

As part of the Online Streaming Act, formerly Bill C-11, the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) announced in June requirements for streaming companies with annual domestic revenues of over $25 million to contribute five per cent of their Canadian sales towards a fund supporting Canadian broadcasting. The money will be distributed to the Canadian Media Fund, the Independent Local News Fund, and various diversity initiatives, including the Black Screen Office Fund, the Canadian Independent Screen Fund for BPOC Creators, and the Indigenous Screen Office Fund.

First Reading

First Reading

Your guide to the world of Canadian politics. (Subscriber exclusive on Saturdays)

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Thanks for signing up!

A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of First Reading will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Article content

Advertisement 3

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Once the new rules go into effect on Sept. 1, The CRTC expects the initiative will represent $200 million in new funding for Canadian media.

Last year, as part of its Online Streaming Act, the federal Liberal government mandated that all online audio and video streaming services — including social media — must register with the CRTC.

Recommended from Editorial

In a speech last summer to the Banff World Media Festival, CRTC CEO Vicky Eatrides indicated the changes would give regulators a clean slate to reimagine Canada’s broadcasting space.

“We have a blank sheet of paper before us, and it’s inviting us not to reshape a world, but to create a system that touches the lives of every one of the almost 40 million of us who lives in this country,” she said in her speech.

“To re-imagine our broadcasting system, we need to involve a greater diversity of players who can add depth and breadth to foundational conversations.”

Rogers said the reality of the CRTC’s tax plan has turned out to be very different from what was described in Eatrides’ remarks and continues to think in radio terms when it comes to promoting music.

Advertisement 4

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

“Streaming and radio aren’t just different, they’re the opposite. There’s a finite number of hours, a finite number of channels, a finite number of options on radio,” Rogers said.

“Streaming is infinite — every user is their own station. (Streaming services’) algorithms have the ability to reach people with the music that they want. People are, importantly, paying for music again, creating opportunities for artists.”

The CRTC defended the tax as a means to level the playing field in Canadian broadcasting.

“This decision is based on an extensive public record, which includes more than 360 detailed submissions and a three-week public hearing during which the CRTC heard from over 120 groups,” it said in a statement to National Post.

“Overall, this decision brings more fairness and more funds into the Canadian broadcasting system.”

Despite today’s diversity in music listening options, the statement said that traditional radio maintains a strong foothold among Canadians, pointing to data that suggest 83 per cent of Canadians still listen to broadcast radio.

Advertisement 5

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

“This decision supports content produced by Canadians. News content, even content that originates from traditional services, will often end up on multiple platforms, including online platforms,” the statement read.

Michael Geist, Canada Research Chair in internet and e-commerce law at the University of Ottawa, said that compelling streamers to pay five per cent of their revenues could have unwanted effects for both consumers and the government.

“Music streaming services operate on thin margins, and the CRTC’s ruling could have an enormous impact on the sector leading to one of two possibilities: either increased costs for consumers or a decision by some streaming services to block the Canadian market on the grounds that the regulatory costs render the business unsustainable,” he said.

“The CRTC seems to have little understanding or interest in the economics of the market and by treating all streaming services as equivalent, it has created great risk and sparked multiple lawsuits.”

Music Canada’s Rogers said the CRTC had plenty of opportunities to create policy that both addresses contemporary needs and looks towards the future of the industry.

Advertisement 6

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

“What we put forward was a vision of a modern system that understands how streaming works,” he said.

“Canadian artists are not up against other Canadian artists — Canadian artists today are up against every song ever recorded from everywhere, and some Canadians are finding great success on that stage.

“There’s been a complete miss of an opportunity.”

National Post

bpassifiume@postmedia.com
x.com/bryanpassifiume

Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.

Article content

Share this article in your social network



Source link

Tags: BroadcastingForcingFundPayStakeholdersstreamersUpset
Sarkiya Ranen

Sarkiya Ranen

I am an editor for Ny Journals, focusing on business and entrepreneurship. I love uncovering emerging trends and crafting stories that inspire and inform readers about innovative ventures and industry insights.

Next Post
Government worried about Ukraine visa program

Government worried about Ukraine visa program

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Headless Sculptures By Famed Polish Artist Go On Auction

Headless Sculptures By Famed Polish Artist Go On Auction

2 years ago
B.J. Novak Shares Glimpse at Night Out With BFF Mindy Kaling

B.J. Novak Shares Glimpse at Night Out With BFF Mindy Kaling

9 months ago

Popular News

    Connect with us

    The NY Journals pride themselves on assembling a proficient and dedicated team comprising seasoned journalists and editors. This collective commitment drives us to provide our esteemed readership with nothing short of the most comprehensive, accurate, and captivating news coverage available.

    Transcending the bounds of New York City to encompass a broader scope, we ensure that our audience remains well-informed and engaged with the latest developments, both locally and beyond.

    NEWS

    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Real Estate
    Instagram Youtube

    © 2026 The New York Journals. All Rights Reserved.

    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Trending

    Copyright © 2023 The Nyjournals

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In