• About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Thursday, July 24, 2025
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
The NY Journals
  • Home
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Trending
  • Home
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Trending
No Result
View All Result
The NY Journals
No Result
View All Result
Home Health

Parties dropping candidates who have faced ‘invasive’ vetting process

by Sarkiya Ranen
in Health
Parties dropping candidates who have faced ‘invasive’ vetting process
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Breadcrumb Trail Links

  1. News
  2. Canada
  3. Canadian Politics
  4. Federal Election

‘What I’m surprised about is that this isn’t happening to dozens more,’ says crisis communicator and political consultant

Published Apr 06, 2025  •  5 minute read

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

The past week saw the Liberals and Conservatives lose due to past indiscretions, highlighting the challenges of thorough vetting processes in political campaigns. Photo by z_wei /Getty Images/iStockphoto

Article content

The past week was a tough one for Canadians running to win a seat in Parliament.

Article content

Article content

Over the course of four days, two Liberals and five Conservatives were either turfed by their parties or resigned over various indiscretions. The NDP didn’t lose a candidate but parted ways with an online influencer thanks to her comments about the Holocaust.

And in the three months before that, another five Liberal nominees were dumped following revelations that ranged from a drunk-driving conviction to a domestic-violence charge (later dropped).

Advertisement 2

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

National Post

THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

  • Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
  • Unlimited online access to National Post.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
  • Support local journalism.

REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.

THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Article content

The extent of the candidate culling in this federal election seems extraordinary, but it underscores a new political reality: few campaigns unfold these days without some past blunder tripping up a prospective legislator.

Recommended from Editorial

At the same time, though, parties have introduced what one academic paper called “lengthy, invasive … and secretive” vetting processes. Which raises the question: why does all that screening so often miss disqualifying howlers? It’s actually quite understandable, maintains Allan Bonner, a crisis communications and political consultant. The nomination committees doing such assessments have a daunting task in an age when the internet and other technologies preserve for posterity much of our lives, he says.

“What I’m surprised about is that this isn’t happening to dozens more,” said Bonner. “You take a cross-section of Canadians … you would find all kinds of people, including me, who have done things that if they appeared on the front page of your newspaper, they would disqualify you from something.”

First Reading

First Reading

Your guide to the world of Canadian politics. (Subscriber exclusive on Saturdays)

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

Thanks for signing up!

A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of First Reading will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Article content

Advertisement 3

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Allan Bonner
Allan Bonner of Toronto-based Allan Bonner Communications Management Inc. ALL

“You have 450 (potential) candidates to vet and you have a few weeks to do it. It’s almost impossible, and this stuff comes out.”

Parties told the National Post Sunday that they do carefully screen prospective candidates.

“We have a rigorous vetting process in place for anyone that wishes to run for the NDP that includes thorough background checks,” said New Democrat spokeswoman Anne McGrath.

None, however, would say exactly what their system entails.

“Obviously, we don’t really discuss the specifics of our vetting process,” said an official with one party. “No parties really get into that. How the sausage is made is not something we discuss.”

Said another party official: “We do not usually comment on our nomination process.”

A few of those secrets have emerged over the years, though. Academics Alex Marland and Brooks Decillia, for instance, obtained 13 screening questionnaires from Conservative, Green, Liberal and NDP parties — one as long as 43 pages — and in a 2020 journal paper revealed some of what happens behind closed, vetting-room doors.

Stringent screening has become an imperative, they say, because of how easily rivals can track down damaging information online, the focus on individual politicians’ profiles and media who prize “salacious news that can be reported with minimal effort.”

Advertisement 4

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Parties used to just interview the nomination contenders, verify resumes and conduct credit and criminal checks, the article notes. With the advent of the internet, screeners would give cursory scans of blog posts and personal websites.

This stuff comes out

Bonner said he was once asked to be a candidate without any vetting at all.

But the process today is something else entirely, as parties poke into everything from sexual behaviour to child-support payments, wrote Marland and Decillia.

“Scrutinizing someone’s personal life is unpleasant for everyone involved, which complicates disclosure of deeply private information,” said the paper.

Parties sometimes ask for current and past email addresses so they can scrub the internet for mentions of messages the potential candidate sent. They may be asked to surrender passwords for social-media sites or to “friend” a party official to allow them to “search for transgressions.”

Some questionnaires ask about the person’s activity on dating sites like Tinder or even Ashley Madison, the site for extramarital affairs, and whether any naked photos of the person appear online.

Advertisement 5

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

A person using the Tinder app on a phone
A political hopeful’s Tinder history could be something that party insiders will investigate before allowing them to seek nomination. Photo by Topher Seguin /Edmonton Journal

Parties will request consent letters allowing them to access personal information from government institutions, like taxes owing, citizenship status and military service, or even whether an applicant’s name is on a child-abuse registry, the paper says.

“The party asks a battery of invasive questions in order to protect the party’s reputation,” write the political scientists. “The questionnaires are a rude awakening about the ferocity of the political arena for many novices.”

With that kind of scrutiny, then, how is it that controversial candidates still slip through the cracks?

The paper suggests that the questionnaires fail when applicants forget about an “emotional outburst” online, don’t perceive past behaviour as problematic or simply “lie or feign ignorance.”

Bonner points to a more fundamental problem: the workload involved in screening hundreds of possible candidates, and the fact that the task is done by unpaid party members, in makeshift quarters under tight deadlines.

“In politics, remember who’s doing this work — it’s a volunteer army,” he said. “And they’re working out of a failed pizza parlour for 56 days.”

Advertisement 6

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

The candidates started to fall last Tuesday, as Toronto-area Liberal Paul Chiang stepped down after it was revealed he encouraged, jokingly or not, turning in a Conservative candidate to Chinese authorities to obtain a bounty from Hong Kong police. (Though Liberal Leader Mark Carney had defended him.) The party ejected Edmonton-area candidate Rod Loyola later in the week after the National Post revealed that he had praised Hamas and Hezbollah at an anti-NATO rally.

The Conservative candidate casualties include Simon Payette, removed from his Quebec riding Friday for disparaging remarks about a survivor of the École Polytechnique massacre who’s running for the Liberals. The Windsor, Ont., candidate Mark McKenzie was pushed overboard amid news he joked in a 2022 podcast about giving the death penalty to then-prime minister Justin Trudeau. Toronto-area’s Dan Patel was let go after it emerged that he had endorsed a social-media post advocating the deportation of unnamed “nonsense” people to India. Stefan Marquis was dumped in the Montreal riding of Laurier-Sainte-Marie, saying only that the party cited recent posts he made on the X site. Lourence Singh was removed from his B.C. constituency but didn’t say why.

Advertisement 7

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

And earlier, five other Liberal candidates were turfed or quit. David Screech was pulled from his B.C. riding in January over what he called “complete nonsense” stalking and harassment allegations. Thomas Keeper was removed as Liberal standard-bearer in a Calgary riding after failing to disclose a 20-year-old domestic-violence charge that was stayed weeks after being laid. MP Chandra Arya had his nomination revoked because of information obtained by the party’s vetting committee, freeing up the Nepean seat for new leader Mark Carney. Umair Ahad was replaced in late March in an Alberta riding by Sean Secord for unspecified reasons. Luc Galvani stepped down as a candidate in Quebec after disclosing he had plead guilty to impaired driving in 2019.

National Post

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.

Article content

Share this article in your social network



Source link

Tags: CandidatesDroppingFacedInvasivePartiesProcessvetting
Sarkiya Ranen

Sarkiya Ranen

I am an editor for Ny Journals, focusing on business and entrepreneurship. I love uncovering emerging trends and crafting stories that inspire and inform readers about innovative ventures and industry insights.

Next Post
Should you go crazy for crypto?

Should you go crazy for crypto?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Man, 25, Dies After Heart Attack In Delhi Zoo, Shocked Wife Jumps To Death

Man, 25, Dies After Heart Attack In Delhi Zoo, Shocked Wife Jumps To Death

1 year ago
‘Bali Was Bali. This Is Delhi’: S Jaishankar On Russia References In ‘Delhi Declaration’

‘Bali Was Bali. This Is Delhi’: S Jaishankar On Russia References In ‘Delhi Declaration’

2 years ago

Popular News

    Connect with us

    The NY Journals pride themselves on assembling a proficient and dedicated team comprising seasoned journalists and editors. This collective commitment drives us to provide our esteemed readership with nothing short of the most comprehensive, accurate, and captivating news coverage available.

    Transcending the bounds of New York City to encompass a broader scope, we ensure that our audience remains well-informed and engaged with the latest developments, both locally and beyond.

    NEWS

    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Real Estate
    Instagram Youtube

    © 2025 The New York Journals. All Rights Reserved.

    • About Us
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Politics
    • Trending

    Copyright © 2023 The Nyjournals

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In