UK letting US use its bases is ‘participation in aggression’, Iran’s foreign minister tells Yvette Cooper – UK politics live
Iran’s foreign minister tells Yvette Cooper UK letting US use bases is ‘participation in aggression’
Iran’s foreign minister has warned the UK it sees its choice to let the US use British bases as “participation in aggression” in a phone call with Yvette Cooper, the foreign secretary, the Press Association reports. PA says:
Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi criticised the “negative and biased approach of Britain” towards the US-Israeli military action against Iran, as well as the UK’s decision to provide military bases for the US to use.
Keir Starmer has granted the US permission for “defensive” action against Iranian missile sites from RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire and Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean.
In a post in Farsi on Telegram, Araghchi said he told Cooper: “These actions will definitely be considered as participation in aggression and will be recorded in the history of relations between the two countries.
“At the same time, we reserve our inherent right to defend the country’s sovereignty and independence.”
The UK has faced repeated criticism from Donald Trump since the war began, and is among countries the US president has recently berated for failing to respond to his request for support in the Strait of Hormuz.
Tehran’s throttling of the key shipping route and attacks on energy facilities across the Gulf have heightened concerns about the security of the supply of fossil fuels.
This morning oil and gas prices retreated after painful cost spikes the previous day and financial markets calmed at the end of another turbulent week.
Key events
Reform UK brushes off concerns about extremism of some of its MSP candidates, with one saying Humza Yousaf ‘not British’
Severin Carrell
Severin Carrell is the Guardian’s Scotland editor.
Reform UK’s Scottish leader, Malcolm Offord, has reportedly brushed off questions about the views of Holyrood candidates accused of spreading false rumours about asylum hotels, of describing Humza Yousaf as an “Islamist moron”, and of backing Tommy Robinson.
Offord and Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, unveiled the party’s slate of 73 Scottish parliament candidates at a country club west of Glasgow on Thursday, claiming they were on course to become Holyrood’s second largest party.
The Courier newspaper reported on Friday that its candidate for North East Fife, Linda Holt, had described Yousaf, the UK’s first Muslim first minister, as “not British” and a “grandstanding Islamist moron” in social media posts.
It said that Rachael Wright, its candidate for Stirling, shared a petition which wrongly claimed a former private school in Perthshire was being “turned into migrant accommodation”. The school’s owners said that claim was “wholly unfounded”, but Reform asserted that denial was a result of its intervention.
Offord told the Courier:
I can’t comment on individual cases. We’ve only just announced the 73 candidates. What I’m very clear about is we’ve done a very, very thorough vetting of those. Inevitably there might be some comments people have made in the past, we’ve all made those comments in the past.
The Record reported that Senga Beresford, Reform’s candidate for Galloway and West Dumfries, endorsed social media posts by Tommy Robison and Britain First, including tweets calling for mass deportations and a ban on burqas. The paper said a Reform spokesperson said they were aware of the remarks, which were “not criminal.”
In January, Farage was pressed by the Guardian on whether Reform UK’s vetting was robust enough in the wake of the conviction of Nathan Gill, his former Ukip ally and Welsh Reform leader, for accepting Russian bribes. He replied:
It has been piss poor in the past and it won’t be in the future …
I promise you, I promise you, we are doing everything we can to make sure these candidates for the Scottish parliament are vetted, and are fit and proper people to put before the electorate. Whether you agree with their views or not, is a separate matter but they’re fit and proper people in every way.
Attorney general Richard Hermer asks if Kemi Badenoch would object to Jewish public prayer
Richard Hermer, the attorney general, has challenged Kemi Badenoch to say whether she would object to Jewish prayer in public, after the Conservative leader backed one of her shadow ministers who said an Islamic prayer event was intimidating and un-British, Peter Walker reports.
Iran’s foreign minister tells Yvette Cooper UK letting US use bases is ‘participation in aggression’
Iran’s foreign minister has warned the UK it sees its choice to let the US use British bases as “participation in aggression” in a phone call with Yvette Cooper, the foreign secretary, the Press Association reports. PA says:
Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi criticised the “negative and biased approach of Britain” towards the US-Israeli military action against Iran, as well as the UK’s decision to provide military bases for the US to use.
Keir Starmer has granted the US permission for “defensive” action against Iranian missile sites from RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire and Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean.
In a post in Farsi on Telegram, Araghchi said he told Cooper: “These actions will definitely be considered as participation in aggression and will be recorded in the history of relations between the two countries.
“At the same time, we reserve our inherent right to defend the country’s sovereignty and independence.”
The UK has faced repeated criticism from Donald Trump since the war began, and is among countries the US president has recently berated for failing to respond to his request for support in the Strait of Hormuz.
Tehran’s throttling of the key shipping route and attacks on energy facilities across the Gulf have heightened concerns about the security of the supply of fossil fuels.
This morning oil and gas prices retreated after painful cost spikes the previous day and financial markets calmed at the end of another turbulent week.
Rightwing narrative fuelling false belief UK public oppose net zero, study finds
Political elites are out of step with the public appetite for net zero, according to analysis that identifies rightwing media narratives as fuelling a false backlash against climate action. Damien Gayle has the story.
Reform UK’s record in local government shows it ‘doesn’t accept need for evidence-based policymaking’, report says
Here is an extract from the conclusion to the report from the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment on Reform UK’s approach to climate change in the councils it runs.
The key finding from this study is that councils led by Reform UK are largely delivering on the party’s pledge to scrap net zero at the local level, and that ”scrapping net zero” is not only a policy position but a signal of a broader retreat from taking climate change seriously. This takes the form of both climate change delay, where commitments are weakened or deferred, and outright climate change denial, where the anthropogenic origin of climate change is rejected. Voters should be aware that this is the case, despite the party’s lack of an explicit position on climate change.
The promotion of climate change denial by both its national leadership and many of its local councillors indicates that Reform UK is failing to recognise the growing risks the British public face from climate change impacts, including rising sea levels, heavier rainfall and more intense heatwaves. It also demonstrates that the party does not accept the need for evidence-based policymaking.
If Reform UK expands its council base in the upcoming local elections, further climate target rollback, the dismantling of scrutiny structures and the withdrawal of voluntary emissions reporting should be expected. Given the vital role local authorities need to play in helping the UK reach its statutory target of net zero emissions by 2050, the government should consider strategic options including incentives to promote progress, rather than assuming voluntary action, and making standardised emissions reporting mandatory, to track progress of programmes that reduce emissions.
Reform UK success in local elections could endanger national climate targets, report says
Good morning. Seven weeks from today, counting will be taking place for the English local elections and, unless the polls are more wrong than they have ever been before, Reform UK will be celebrating record wins. The commentary will focus on the implications for national politics. But councils have significant powers, and a report today says Reform wins in local government could have a significant impact on climate policy.
We know that Reform UK are opposed to net zero, and they have pledged to cut green subsidies, but there is still some lack of clarity as to exactly what they would do on climate policy more generally. Some Reform UK figures refuse point-blank to acknowledge that human-made global heating is a reality. Others claim they are just opposed to the pace of transition to renewables. But Nigel Farage, the party leader, has a long history of climate change scepticism.
To explore this in more detail, the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the LSE has invesgtigated what Reform UK has been doing in the councils it has been running since it won them last May, and it has published its report this morning. Here are the key findings.
• Seven Reform UK-led councils have “scrapped” their climate targets and climate change denial has been expressed by Reform UK councillors in five councils. Some of these councils have removed content about climate change from strategy documents.
• While work related to reducing greenhouse gas emissions continues in these councils, mitigating climate change is no longer explicitly cited as the motivation.
• However, there is variation in how “scrapping net zero” is being implemented, reflecting an apparent divergence of views within the party.
• There is also a lack of clarity in the party’s claims of how “scrapping net zero” has achieved financial savings and how the party defines expenditure on net zero.
• Reform UK is likely to win control of more local authorities in May 2026, including further unitary authorities with responsibilities for planning applications and housing, policy areas of importance to national climate targets.
• National government will face greater challenges in ensuring that local authorities contribute to the delivery of legislative and policy climate goals if Reform UK wins more seats.
This chart sets out what has been happening in the 10 councils where Reform UK has full control.
Edward de Quay, one of the analysts who wrote the report, said:
In our study we found that ‘scrapping net zero’ is not only a policy position but a signal of a broader retreat from treating climate change as urgent. This takes the form of both delaying action and outright climate change denial. Voters should be aware that this is the case.
In the upcoming local elections in May, should Reform UK expand its council base, we can expect further retreat from climate action. The government must be alert to this challenge, given the importance of local authorities to the delivery of national climate goals.
Here is the agenda for the day.
Morning: Steve Reed, the housing secretary, is on a visit.
10am: Peers resume their debate on the assisted dying bill.
11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.
Afternoon: Kemi Badenoch is on a visit in the south of England.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (between 10am and 3pm), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
