Oil prices plunge 15% to below $100, stocks surge and dollar slumps after Trump announces US-Iran ceasefire – business live

Neil Shearing, chief economist at Capital Economics, said Iran’s plan to charge transit fees for ships to pass through the strait of Hormuz would only have a modest impact on global energy priced but would amount to a “de facto nationalisation of the shipping route”.

There are significant hurdles to overcome before the ceasefire agreement between the US, Israel and Iran can translate into a lasting end to the war. But if it were to hold, it would move outcomes closer to those envisaged in our “baseline” forecast. In that scenario, oil prices decline but still end the year at $80 a barrel, headline inflation rises to around 3-4% year-on-year in the US and Europe and, while GDP growth slows in most major economies, the overall economic damage outside of the region remains limited.

Talks between the US and Iran, on the basis of Tehran’s 10-point framework, which Washington has apparently accepted as a starting point, are expected to begin in Islamabad on Friday. The plan contains several provisions that are likely to prove difficult for both sides.

These include acceptance of Iran’s continued uranium enrichment, a demand that US/western sanctions on the country be lifted, and the withdrawal of US forces from all bases in the region. Shearing said:

It is difficult to see these points being agreed to in full. Some compromise will be required and, without it, there’s a good chance the agreement will fall apart and the conflict resumes.

Turning to markets, Shearing said:

For markets, the most critical issue remains the status of the strait of Hormuz. The framework appears to allow the full passage of oil tankers through the strait, but the terms under which this would occur remain unclear. Some reports suggest the introduction of transit fees of around $1m–2m per tanker.

Given that tankers typically carry 1m–2m barrels of crude, such fees would add roughly $1 per barrel to the cost of oil transported through the Strait. This would therefore have only a modest impact on global energy prices though, in practice, it could amount to a de facto partial nationalisation of the shipping route.

If these issues can be resolved and a deal is reached, we would get closer to Jefferies’ baseline scenario, which assumes the conflict de-escalates by the end of this month and energy flows through the strait resume along the same timeframe.

Even in that scenario, however, there would still be some economic damage. The impact would be most severe in the region itself, where we estimate that GDP could contract by around 10% in the countries most directly affected. The long-lasting damage to LNG facilities in Qatar means it could be disproportionately affected.

Meanwhile, although oil and natural gas prices have fallen sharply today, they are likely to remain elevated relative to earlier in the year. In our baseline forecast, Brent crude averages around $95 per barrel in the second quarter before easing towards $80 by the fourth quarter.

Inflation in the major advanced economies also has further to rise. We expect it to peak at around 4.5% in the UK and between 3.5% and 4% in the US and the euro-zone. US inflation data due later this week will provide an early indication of how quickly those pressures are building.

Finally, the rate hikes currently priced into markets may prove excessive. If energy prices stabilise and growth holds up better than feared, central banks are unlikely to deliver the tightening now priced into markets, which in turn would flatten the front end of yield curves. Equity markets are likely to ebb and flow according to developments in the talks over the next couple of weeks but in our baseline scenario a recovery in risk appetite pushes the S&P 500 above 7,000 by the middle of the year.